Paleo
Going a little bit more meta, I guess, so... you have talked before about having a Big Talk with us after Wind and Truth, because it's like this big capstone to the saga of Stormlight, and even like the entire Cosmere in some sense. Has this actually already happened? Because we had this gloves-off moment after The Lost Metal *gets interrupted by Brandon for a moment, then continues* was it that moment, and do you still plan to talk to us about it?
Brandon Sanderson
No, I mean, I can talk about it here. Part of it is a little bit of... not an apology, but a fake apology. I knew that I had to pretend—hmm, pretend is the wrong term. I've known all along that Book 5 was a cliffhanger and a bit of a downer. I couldn't talk about it that way during Book 1, because otherwise everyone knows what Book 5 is. So I had to talk about Book 5 as the end of Arc 1 and Era 1 [of Stormlight]. As I was talking about it [that way], I realized several years in, people are assuming it to be an end of an arc in the way that an anime arc is the end of an anime arc. Not the way that, you know, it's less—it's not even really Empire Strikes Back. It is the end of an arc, in that, we ambiguously lost? And kinda won, [but] mostly lost? Everything fell apart. Book 5 is "The Stormlight Archive unravels," [and] not the triumphant conclusion. You can see the problem that I have, knowing that my model for Book 5 was Final Fantasy VI, the mid-point, where the world ends. Have you guys played Final Fantasy VI? The world ends half-way through Final Fantasy VI. It was more that, and then we're going to do five books in a post-apocalyptic Roshar.
And knowing that, and not understanding-- what is the Big Talk? The Big Talk is, on one hand, I'm sorry that I couldn't prepare you for this. Usually I'm pretty good at preparing my fan-base for what's coming—when I split a book, when a book delays, when you need to brace yourselves for something. And I couldn't do that for Book 5. And not being able to do that for Book 5 was a little hard. And so, I am sorry for that. It is the right artistic choice, but that's kind of what the Big Talk is about. It's this idea of, "I didn't intentionally mislead you, but I realized as I was talking about the book that I couldn't say as much as I'm used to saying." And this goes back 10 years, or longer. And I knew people were expecting more of like an Era-1-of-Mistborn end, and then a soft reboot. Not a, "the world completely falls apart, and everybody is left in a terrible situation" end.
I even pulled back on that, I think I've talked about this before. The editor at Tor was like, "You can't release this book, Brandon! You can't! You can't release this book! It's too sad!" And some nods towards that were giving the seon to Shallan, so that she could contact Adolin, because I knew by Book 6 that would've happened. So I'm like, "Alright I can do it now, to take the edge off just a little bit there." There's two Hoid epilogues—one of those was written to try to take the edge off a little bit, if that makes sense.
But the book's supposed to be a kick to the face, and if we don't have a kick to the face then the Stormlight Archive as a series doesn't work as I have planned that arc. And it's rough because I couldn't prepare anyone for it. I told Peter, "So this book's gonna come out, this is the point—if I'm ever going to have a point where my career could collapse, it is this book. I know what fans want, and I did not give it to them." And this is the first time in my career that I just didn't give it to them. You could argue that I didn't give you Kaladin's oath at the end of Oathbringer, but I just delayed that and gave it to you in Book 4. In this book, I just said, "No, I've [not] given them what they want and I know what they want, and that's going to be hard. It's going to be really hard both for me, and for them."
And the real trick and the kind of punch is, I've never done this before. So my artistic instincts say this is what's right, and I'm going with them. It could be wrong, right? This could be the thing that in twenty years, I'm like, "Oh man, I should've written another book that has the same emotional arc as Books 1, 2 and 3, rather than taking Books 4 and 5 and changing it up so much." And maybe we'll do this interview and be like, "Well, I was the biggest selling fantasy author in the world and then I refused to give readers what they wanted, selfishly and arrogantly, and I really should've just done it." But we'll see. What I've always been saying is, "We will know if this book's a success in seven or eight years, not in seven or eight weeks like we've done with all the other books."
And I don't listen to the podcast, but I'm sure you guys have had plenty of discussions about that idea, and whether that's a good idea, and why it aggravates readers, and the parts of it that aggravate readers and the parts of it that disappoint readers, and things like that. We'll see if my artistic inclinations are correct when you interview me in seven or eight years.
Kaymyth
If it makes you feel any better, there is a small subset of the fandom that thinks it should've been darker at the end.
Brandon Sanderson
Yeah. I'm actually one of those, but I recognized that I just couldn't do it. If I didn't have a six to eight year gap in between, maybe I could've, right? Like, David, if I had a new Stormlight book, already secretly written and coming out in a year, then I could've probably gone even darker with that ending. I could've sucked a little more hope out of things. But I just couldn't, not with the six to eight years [in between].
There needs to be kind of this tonal promise that there is still light, and we're still going to find it. And that's at least what my gut said. I do know there is a subset of that—and it's not necessarily even the darkness that is going to be controversial. I think fans do like books to go dark now and then. It's the, "Reading a Sanderson book and not actually knowing where the pacing is going, where the plotlines are going, what you're supposed to expect." When you read one of my books, if you are a close reader—which I assume most of your audience is—I put in all this kind of tonal foreshadowing that tells you what kind of ending you're supposed to expect. And, you can feel the book start to swell and hit there, in the [Sanderlanche]. And you're like, "I've been reading all this time, expecting this thing and Sanderson is gonna deliver" and I do. Sometimes what I deliver is different but I always foreshadow that. Whether it's going to be bittersweet, whether it's going to be triumphant, whether there's going to have a lot of worldbuilding or if it's just going to be action. These are all things that I'm foreshadowing and building to that Sanderlanche.
And this book—again I don't know if people are actually saying—but my assumption is that the response seems to be like, "No no, its not the darkness. The publishers are distraught. The publishers are scared because dark is not marketable." And they're wrong, dark is very marketable. They look at things in [with] the wrong lens. The thing is the not-knowing-where-it's-going; those cues being odd and a little off. The darkness being a kind of darkness where you're going, eugh rather than, "Oh no, they're in a terrible spot but they're going to pull through!" Right? It's less darkness, that's the problem—well it's not a problem, it's what I wrote into the book—and more of a, "I no longer know what this series is, and I don't if I love it anymore." Right? That's the dangerous thing that I'm writing into it.
Like I said I think in a post at some point—when a symphony goes atonal, all of a sudden, unexpectedly, and it seems like nails on a chalkboard. I'm looking for a little bit of that with this book, and that's super dangerous! And maybe stupid.
So, that's what the conversation is. I did that intentionally. We'll see if it's the right idea.